|
05/11/2008
|
 |
 |
2005 Devinci Wilson Review
By Mike Wallace
|
It was a perfect match. I had lined up a one month stay at Whistler and a 2005
Devinci Wilson to test.
The combination of the greatest bike park ever built together with a long and
low full downhill rig had me more than a little excited.
Just to add another level of sweetness, the guys at Devinci were allowing us to keep the bike for two months ensuring that the bike would get a good workout on the slopes of the North Shore as well. This wasn't going to be one of those MBA type tests where a bunch of guys spend the afternoon riding the bike through some smooth dry single track with a few cacti to spice up the photos.
My current ride is a 2003 Santa Cruz Bullit with a Progressive Fifth Element
in the rear and a Boxxer on the front. An awesome bike for the shore but not
exactly your dream Whistler ride. The steep goodness of the Garbanzo zone has
made Whistler more downhill bike-friendly than ever.
Out Of The Box
After pulling the bike out of the box the first thing I did was take it down
to the boys at Steed Cycles
- the North Shore's Devinci dealer - for a once over and a little set-up assistance.
They spent a couple hours with me setting up the rear shock, checking the fork
oil level and resetting the spacers on the E13 SRS chain guide. Of course, the
once over would have gone a lot quicker if we hadn't spent so much time complimenting
the spec kit.
Fresh out of the box.
The Wilson comes stock with a Fox DHX 5.0 rear shock, a Rock Shox Boxxer World
Cup 203mm fork, an FSA Orbit 1.5 headset, a SRAM XO derailleur, a Race Face
Diabolus X-Type cranks (40 tooth ring), Hayes El Camino HD 8" brakes and a Mavic
Dee-Max wheel set. Tires are both Michelin tubeless DH Comps. Rear wheel travel
can be set at 180 or 215mm travel.
One of the most obvious traits of this machine is its relative light weight.
The specifications on the Devinci Web site show a weight of 41.5 lbs. I weighed
the bike in at 42.5 lbs (medium frame size) on a very high tech digital bathroom
scale. This is awesome. For reference, my Bullet weighs in at 39 lbs and a large
Rocky Mountain Switch weighs in at 42.5 lbs. Neither of these bikes have the
downhill ability or the rear travel of the Wilson.
|
First Test: Whistler
With the bike ready to go (thanks again to Scott and the guys at Steed)
I headed up to Whistler. The bike felt very comfortable right away. This
didn't surprise me though as switching from a bike with relatively steep
angles to a bike with slack angles almost always feels good, especially
on steeper terrain.
The very first thing I noticed as I headed down Schleyer and Clown Shoes
is that the back end felt light - not what I expected from a balls out
downhill bike. The bike felt quick and light getting up and over rocks
and roots. The first couple of runs down A-line were also great. Again,
the bike felt light in the air and was easy to move around. I was loving
the lower bottom bracket height on the berms and the way the Horst Link
Suspension dealt with the dreaded A-line braking bumps. I was pumped as
I hadn't even taken it to the fast and rough terrain for which it was
built.
Ed Note: The bike Mike tested was the Canadian model which uses the
Horst Link. The US model has the pivot on the seat stay and is thus not
a Horst Link. |

Taking the Wilson for a test flight.Photo - Ron Gosney
|
It was after hitting up Original Sin and No Joke that I really started to get
a feel for the bike. On the really rough stuff I could just point it and hang
on. The bike dealt with whatever came its way. In fact I got into trouble a
couple of times during those early rides because I became a little too relaxed.
As expected, after several laps I realized I needed to make a few changes
to the bike's set-up. The World Cup Boxxer felt a little stiff on the smaller
stuff (especially when cold on the early parts of the ride), the rear shock
was bottoming on the bigger hits and launches and I just couldn't seem to get
the El Caminos' lever travel adjusted correctly. My streak of good fortune however
was continuing. Fate was such that just when I needed a little technical assistance
Crankworx came to town and of course all the component manufactures came along
with it.
The Brakes
My first stop was the Hayes tent. It turns out that on some of the El Caminos
the lever reach adjustment screw was fitted with a spacer to prevent people
from adjusting the levers too far in towards the bar. Once Hayes removed the
spacer and installed the proper knurled knob reach-adjuster I was able to adjust
the brakes until they felt good.
 Note the silver Power Adjustment knob at bottom of the photo. | These
sweet looking El Camino brakes also come with a separate adjustment called
the Power Adjuster. By adjusting this knob you are essentially changing
the pivot point position so that you get more or less torque. When the
Power Adjuster is set to max though, the lever action feels very spongy.
The idea is that you have both power and modulation. Modulation is obviously
very important when riding steeps but I found the feel a little hard to
get used to. When the lever is set to maximum modulation it cannot be
adjusted too close to the bar or it will make contact. |
I also learned from the experienced bike wizards over at FanatykCo
bike shop that the brake pistons have a much longer range of travel than most
disk brakes and can be adjusted to suit. In my case, reducing the stroke at
the piston resulted in less travel at the lever and therefore less fatigued
hands. Bottom line here is that these levers have a huge range of adjustment
and everyone should be able to find a position they like. On the downside the
El Caminos suffered some fade when riding long, fast top-to-bottom laps. Perhaps
this is a result of the streamlined shape limiting heat dissipation? After a
just a few rides I had to bleed both the front and back brakes. The good old
Hayes Mags on my Bullit rarely require a bleed.
The Rear Shock
Second stop was the Fox tent. The rear shock was handling the small bumps well but I was bottoming out on some of the larger launches. The bottoming was a concern considering that there are very few launches at Whistler without beautiful trannies.
The first thing that Mike (a Fox mechanic) did was swap the 350 lb spring out
for a 400 lb spring. The goal with spring selection is to have the correct amount
of sag (3/4" in this case) with only slight preload. The adjuster nut is turned
in enough to keep some tension on the spring. Once this is set the shock can
be properly dialled in. The rebound was set at 6 clicks from the slowest and
the ProPedal was also dialled in six clicks. Recommended air pressure is 130-150
psi with the bottom out adjuster fully open. With the bottom out full open the
shock feel is plushest but also the most linear. They recommended to dial in
the bottom out only if I found that I was still regularly bottoming out with
the heavier spring.
The set-up tips all made great sense and I would definitely like to thank
Mike van Lienden and the guys at Fox for taking the time to share their wisdom.
After these adjustments the Wilson's rear end felt pretty much bottomless. Doing
the A-line rock drop with speed instantly became fun instead of a test of my
spine's ability to withstand a regular pounding.
The Front Fork
The third and final stop was the Rock Shox/SRAM tent to talk about how
to get the most out of the Boxxer World Cup fork. Once again I was the
beneficiary of some excellent advice. The Rock Shock gurus recommend riding
with the stock oil for at least 4-5 rides. They say the oil that comes
with these shocks is not a particularly great lubricant and will not give
the fork the smoothest feel but it is very good at cleansing and scrubbing
the internals. In other words the oil effectively removes the little bits
of metal or whatever comes inside the brand new fork. After these first
few rides they recommend changing the oil for a quality fork oil. I did
exactly that and was rewarded with a significant improvement in plushness
on the high speed small to medium hits.
|
 Sweet SRAM XO derailleur hanging off a massive rear dropout. |
Speaking of SRAM products. The XO derailleur performed flawlessly. I never had to touch or adjust the derailleur once in that month of Whistler riding. Shifting stayed clean and crisp without any need for the usual cable adjustments. The XO's are not cheap but this is another case of you get what you pay for.
The Wheels
Now, on to the subject of wheels. The ultra-trick, light Dee Max wheels with
tubeless tires, 32 straight pull spokes, unusual nipples and black and yellow
colours are absolutely beautiful. Unfortunately they have been nothing but a
headache from the first ride. These wheels are high maintenance. I found that
the wheels (especially the rear) needed to be tensioned regularly. The spokes
are sitting in a U shaped clip on the hub and they can actually fall out of
the clip when no tension is applied. I couldn't find the proper spoke wrench
to purchase and, at least at the beginning of the summer, most shops didn't
even have one so keeping the wheels adjusted was a pain. With tubeless wheels
the idea is save weight and cut down on pinch flats; no tube = nothing to pinch.
The concept is a good one. At Whistler the shale cuts into tires so the only
way to keep running tubeless is to change tires regularly - an expensive proposition.
The bottom line is that these are high performance race wheels and like a lot
of high performance equipment, they require a lot of attention.
Stepping it up on the Freight Train at Whistler. Photo
- Ron Gosney
The Wilson is actually designed for a 150 mm rear hub. For some reason the
2005 came spec'd with a 135mm. To overcome this problem the dropout on the brake
side actually curves in to accommodate the smaller hub. What this means is that
the wheel needs to be dished a lot to keep it centred. Dishing a wheel to that
extent cannot be good for wheel integrity and strength. I actually broke my
10mm axle on the brake side while riding A-line. This is a fairly strange set-up
which fortunately has been remedied for 2006. The 2006 Wilson comes with Daredevil
hubs which are mated up with Mavic EX823 tubeless rims. Rear hub width will
now be 150mm.
Everybody knows that downhill bikes have slack head angles. The Interesting thing about the Wilson is that it has the slackest head angle of any bike I have seen. At 64 degrees it is slacker than the Demo 9, Norco DH and the Intense M3 which are 66 deg, 64.5 and 66.5 respectively. The bike actually looks chopped when sitting on the roof racks next to any of my buddies' bikes. The good thing is that the number matters little when you are flying down the mountain on a bike that manages to feel light and stable at the same time. You do notice the slackness of course when doing tight slow speed hairpin corners. For most people looking at this bike however, having to concentrate a little more on the really tight slow corners will matter very little.
Second Test: The Shore
For me the last true test of the Wilson was going to be a few days riding on
the shore. I was looking forward to trying those slack angles on some of the
steeper trails. Also, I had people warn me that I wouldn't like the bike on
the skinnies so I was curious to give it a go. A slack head angle positions
the front wheel further out in front giving a slack bike a tendency to flop
to the side when moving slowly, especially on tight switchbacks or skinnies.
Obviously the Wilson is not designed for shore style skinnies. However, if the
bike demonstrates it can handle them it's going to appeal to wider range of
riders.
On the rough Shore-style steeps the bike ripped. The combination of the angles
and the plush suspension front and back made everything just that little bit
easier. When riding steep rolls to flat (like the Cherry Bomb on Cypress) the
bike pushes through beautifully. The bike felt fine on the skinnies. I found
it all boiled down to concentration but this is the case on any bike. On the
skinnies with turns I found that the extra wheelbase length warranted a little
more rear end hopping but when the rear feels light and solid (due to the position
sensitive rear shock) this is not a problem. For some reason I was under the
impression that a lot of the corners on the shore are really tight and slow
but on the Wilson, I found that very few corners actually need to be ridden
slowly. Ahhh - the magic of a downhill bike.
Devinci has changed both the front and rear suspenders for 2006. On the front
you will find a Fox 40 RC2. Devinci has boldly chosen a DHX Air 5.0 for the
rear. There are significant weight savings to be made by eliminated the coil
sping and obviously Devinci feels the air shocks are now ready for the abuse
dished out by a full downhill rig.
The Verdict
Overall this bike is amazing. It is stable at speed, it efficiently absorbs
both the small and big hits and it feels light both on the ground and in the
air. For 2005 I believe there were some spec issues that were a problem unless
you have a team mechanic, but these have been remedied for 2006.
In Canada the 2006 Wilson, with a Fox DHX Air rear shock and a 40 RC2 fork
will run you CDN$5999.
| *Specs: |
4.0  |
| Ride: |
5.0  |
| Price: |
4.0  |
| Overall: |
4.5  |
|
| Pros: |
Cons: |
- Bottomless rear travel
- Handles very well at speed and on steeps
- Light weight for a downhill bike
- Trouble free frame and suspension linkage |
- Wheelset demands too much attention
- Rear hub doesn't match frame design
- Brakes not robust enough for this type of bike (fade on long steep downhills)
|
|
For more info on the Wilson and other Devincis head to devinci.com
|